Skip to content
Home » Tennis » Tabata, Ryo vs Ferguson,Chase

Tabata, Ryo vs Ferguson,Chase

Expert Overview: Tabata vs Ferguson Tennis Match

The upcoming match between Ryo Tabata and Chase Ferguson on October 29, 2025, is expected to be an intriguing contest. This expert analysis provides insights into the betting predictions for the match, focusing on various aspects such as set games, tie breaks, and total games. These predictions are based on current data and trends within the tennis world.

Tabata, Ryo

LLLWW
-

Ferguson,Chase

LWWWW
Date: 2025-10-29
Time: 05:00
Venue: Not Available Yet

1st Set Predictions

  • Over 1st Set Games (62.10): The probability suggests a competitive first set with more than 6 games, indicating a closely contested start.
  • Tie Break in 1st Set (No) (89.60): A high likelihood that the first set will not go to a tie break, suggesting a decisive conclusion within six games.
  • Under 1st Set Games (51.60): There is a moderate chance that the first set will have fewer than 6 games, hinting at a potential quick start by one of the players.

Match Predictions

  • Tie Break in Match (No) (82.60): A strong prediction that the match will conclude without any tie breaks, indicating potential dominance by one player.
  • Under 2.5 Sets (62.80): A likely outcome is that the match will be decided in two sets, suggesting one player’s clear advantage.

Total Games Predictions

  • Total Games 3-Way (Under 22) (62.70): The expectation is that the total number of games in the match will be under 22, pointing towards a swift match resolution.
  • Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5) (53.70): A prediction leaning towards fewer than 22.5 total games, reinforcing the idea of a quick and decisive match.

Additional Expert Predictions

Ryo Tabata is expected to leverage his experience and tactical play to secure an advantage early in the match. Chase Ferguson’s agility and serve might challenge Tabata, but Tabata’s consistency could prevail. Overall, the match is anticipated to be fast-paced with decisive outcomes in both sets.